What is the truth of Starmer and Alli
Note, this is not clickbait, I am covering – and debunking – this for lack of evidence. I have no dirt to expose! There is no CCTV to be found! This is just something I heard last year, repeated in quiet corners over time and that appears to be picking up speed and getting dirtier the more it rolls in the muck.
I also find it curious that this started to balloon into a (none) story on social media platforms just as we are running up to the May local elections. The timing is just a little too convenient for my liking!
At this point it’s just rumour and innuendo. Not only is there no meat on the bone, there is no bone!
I actually covered it a week or too back, debunking it then, and today – to my surprise, ex MP George Galloway also took up the mantle, saying I don’t care who Keir Starmer sleeps with.
He could sleep with the donkeys in his sanctuary, as long as it wasn’t improper. What is improper is his financial relationship with Lord Alli
George Galloway, April 2025
Daily Mail
A few days after I posted this The Mail finally caught up with the story. Once against, I’m calling BS on stories like this, even if it is in the Mail! I haven’t read the Mail piece (ad paywall, sod that), but I read enough to see they think it’s fake, and not ‘terrifying’, as some clickbait describes it.
Absolutely I’d love it to be true if it got him removed, but if the Mail had anything of substance, they’d have shared it.
Anyway, the link in the clickbait I saw used a tribal shorturls – I do not trust them and neither should you. Those tinyurls can go anywhere! Find a reliable tinyurl reverse lookup and see what it resolves to first!
In this case link was indeed the Daily Mail: Truth about the video of Keiir Starmer kissing Lord Alli
Keir Starmer faces fresh questions on his relationship with Lord Alli from last year: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13934619/Keir-Starmer-relationship-Lord-Alli-claims-multi-millionaire-donors-influence.html)
Good Morning Britain (Facebok, 2024): Sir Keir Starmer is facing fresh questions about his relationship with multi-millionaire donor Lord Alli following new claims the businessman was closely involved in the Labour Party’s preparations for power.)
HOWEVER On X, Youtube and TikTok however are wild claims that Starmer was caught kissing Lord Alli 
.
This then goes a step further and claims – almost unbelievably – that someone, (possibly Jim Davidson) caught it on (CCTV) camera.
Then Davidson allegedly showed it to Starmer’s his wife, who run off crying and now wants to divorve him.
(A different version claims Starmer has a love child!)
There are scores, hundreds of juicy sounding videos promising to deliver the dirt, innuendos oozing out of the limk titles…
I glanced as a few, none have anything, not are remotely trustworking, so I’m not going to waste my time – or yours – linking any.
I will, however, give you an idea of what’s going on.
All the best conspiracy theories are true
I actually studied psychology at University; one of the modules was on conspiracy theories…
True story:
During one lecturer a professor, one specialising in this field, reached out to the room, asking if anyone could cite a single conspiracy theory that proved to be true. I could actually cite several and picked one.
“See!”, he gloated. “See, some people…” he said mockingly, looking me up and down and pointing at me, “Some gullible people will believe anything!”
At which point several people got on their phones, hands went up, “Umm, Sir. He’s right. Facebook admitted it today. It’s true.”
Bastard didn’t even apologise, just mumbled, “I must have missed that and slunk out the door, left another lecturer to take over.
Anyway, while conspiracy theories proving true is for the ‘I want to believe’ crowd, the actual accepted theory is that all the best conspiracy theories have an element of truth in them. The more truth is mixed into the pot, the more believable the conspiracy. When the icing on cake is someone like Starmer, well, it loks like we have a winner.
I actually hope it is true, it would destroy Starmer and probably take his wretched government with it. If it has to ruin all their careers, I’m OK with that.
Truths:
Some of this could fit with why Starmer and his son moved out the family house last year and into Lord Alli’s penthouse. The offical line is that his son was studying for exams and wanted peace and quiet. However, the exams don’t line up with the timing and amount of time there, pouring more petrol of the fire. 
It also fits with HoC gossip and “we can’t disclose what we know” comments from journalists.
However, while there may be ‘something’ I am not inclined to believe a word of the rumours.
Also, I couldn’t actually care if Starmer does or does not have a love child, as such. It’s personal shit and none of our business.
Similarly, I couldn’t care less if Starmer does turn out to be having a gay fling with Lord Alli, as such. There are openly gay MPs, I’m sure. Nobody cares and if they do, they shouldn’t.
The problem – IF true – is the secrecy. The ‘dirty secret’.
That such ‘dirt’ on a leading politician has a word: leverage.
If people have a prime minister over a barrel (so to speak) and are or can blackmail him, it is a problem for everyone in the country.
Which takes up back to what journalist were whsipering about last year. That they’d had a gagging order slapped on them. All of them. That it would, they said, come back to bite him on the arse. That it would be better if he just ripped the band-aid off.
I am strongly reminded of President Clinton and Monica Lewinksky. Nobody in American cared what went on in the presidentally potting shed. Nobody cared that she’d blown him in the oval office. Nobody cared that Hillary publicly forgive him. That he’d got caught with his pants down and, proverbially, wiped her lipstick off…
No, they were furious that he lied about it. That was whaat was unforgiveable to them. That was what destroyed him career!
That was the end of him!
Feature image from Pixabay, by Robin Higgins
